More Dishonesty

 Contents 


Scientology/Narconon Main Page


Home


Email Editor

 

Narconon Stone Hawk director Kate Wickstrom would have us believe that Narconon's techniques are effective, using the EPA(!) as a reference.  Incidentally, would somebody please tell me what environmental protection has to do with quack drug rehabilitation scams?  Thanks to the ever-alert denizens of alt.religion.scientology I was made aware of some interesting information:

Wickstrom states:

The technical methodology used by Narconon has been scientifically studied. To quote from a 1998 addressed published by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency after an international conference in Washington regarding a formal study of Mr. Hubbard's sauna program, the conclusion states: "There is evidence suggesting that the program revitalizes the immune system and improves the general physical condition of the participant. . . . In addition, the detoxification program devised by Hubbard possesses a powerful psychotherapeutic potential." Lastly, after early confusions were cleared up decades ago, Narconon staff continue to work with justice departments worldwide, including a Utah juvenile court program; in Pretoria, South Africa; in Baja, California; Mexico prisons, etc.

Let's address the EPA issue first.  Exactly who in the EPA had occasion to comment on Narconon's techniques, and what was a member of the EPA doing commenting on a drug rehab program?  A news posting by one Chris Owen of the UK whose post can be read here stated:

William L. Marcus is a toxicologist for the Environmental Protection Agency regularly cited by Narconon as a supporter of L. Ron Hubbard's pseudoscientific "purification" therapy. Jeff Jacobsen asked if anyone had any further info on Marcus. Marcus is listed as a Narconon staff member (to be exact, a member of the Narconon International Scientific Advisory Board) on the website of Narconon California. He is described as follows: "Dr. Marcus is Senior Science Advisor and Chief Toxicologist for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. He has conducted ground-breaking research in the field of environmental toxicology and pharmacology."

Ah, now we begin to see what the deal is, he's one of them.  Narconon uses his "findings" as support for their treatment program over against the many warnings by respected medical professionals such as Dr. C. Everett Koop, who keenly perceived the blatant quackery and potential lethality of L. Ron Hubbard's "Purification Rundown". 

From another Chris Owen posting:

As the list above shows, many of Narconon's most vocal supporters are themselves Scientologists. Drs Shields and Beckmann and their co-author Mr. Wisner are well-known Scientologists. Dr. Gene Denk, who has also publicly supported Narconon, is a Florida-based Scientologist who used to be L. Ron Hubbard's personal physician. This raises serious questions about their neutrality. As committed Scientologists, they have a direct personal stake in proving the veracity of their guru's theories.

Mrs. Wickstrom continues, adding that "confusions were cleared up decades ago" and that Narconon staff continue to work with "justice departments worldwide", including "Baja, California".  Shouldn't that read "Baja California", a state in Mexico?  Is this a deliberate obfuscation or an egregious typographical error?  One poster to alt.religion.scientology stated that "Where the heck is Baja, California? Do they mean Baja California, which is now redundant with 'Mexico prisons'? Interesting they try to slip that by as a US-sounding location. Also interesting is they seem to be able to come up with only one (real) US location." 

More on the purported effectiveness of Narconon

Visit www.xenu.net

©2002 Todd A. Phipps